aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/www/upcoming_meeting.html
blob: 3b1a4d02ab0a9991dd4275a5dceb1a3a58a633eb (plain) (blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
          "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
<!-- Material used from: HTML 4.01 specs: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/ -->
<html>
<head>
  <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
  <title>libc++ Upcoming Meeting Status</title>
  <link type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" href="menu.css">
  <link type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" href="content.css">
</head>

<body>
<div id="menu">
  <div>
    <a href="http://llvm.org/">LLVM Home</a>
  </div>

  <div class="submenu">
    <label>libc++ Info</label>
    <a href="/index.html">About</a>
  </div>

  <div class="submenu">
    <label>Quick Links</label>
    <a href="http://lists.llvm.org/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev">cfe-dev</a>
    <a href="http://lists.llvm.org/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits">cfe-commits</a>
    <a href="http://llvm.org/bugs/">Bug Reports</a>
    <a href="http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/">Browse SVN</a>
    <a href="http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/">Browse ViewVC</a>
  </div>
</div>

<div id="content">
  <!--*********************************************************************-->
  <h1>libc++ Issaquah Status</h1>
  <!--*********************************************************************-->

  <p>This is a temporary page; please check the c++1z status <a href="http://libcxx.llvm.org/cxx1z_status.html">here</a></p>
  <p>This page shows the status of the papers and issues that are expected to be adopted in Issaquah.</p>

  <p>The groups that have contributed papers:
  <ul>
    <li>LWG - Library working group</li>
    <li>CWG - Core Language Working group</li>
    <li>SG1 - Study group #1 (Concurrency working group)</li>
  </ul>
  </p>
  
  <h3>Paper Status</h3>
  <table id="papers" border="1">
	<tr><th>Paper #</th><th>Group</th><th>Paper Name</th><th>Meeting</th><th>Status</th><th>First released version</th></tr>
<!--
	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2012/n3346.pdf">3346</a></td><td>LWG</td><td>Terminology for Container Element Requirements - Rev 1</td><td>Kona</td><td>Complete</td><td>3.4</td></tr>
-->
<!--  	<tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr> -->
  </table>

  <h3>Library Working group Issues Status</h3>
  <table id="issues" border="1">
	<tr><th>Issue #</th><th>Issue Name</th><th>Meeting</th><th>Status</th></tr>

	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2062">2062</a></td><td>Effect contradictions w/o no-throw guarantee of std::function swaps</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing to do.</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2166">2166</a></td><td>Heap property underspecified?</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2221">2221</a></td><td>No formatted output operator for nullptr</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Patch ready</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2223">2223</a></td><td>shrink_to_fit effect on iterator validity</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing to do.</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2261">2261</a></td><td>Are containers required to use their 'pointer' type internally?</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2394">2394</a></td><td>locale::name specification unclear - what is implementation-defined?</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing to do.</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2460">2460</a></td><td>LWG issue 2408 and value categories</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing to do.</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2468">2468</a></td><td>Self-move-assignment of library types</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2475">2475</a></td><td>Allow overwriting of std::basic_string terminator with charT() to allow cleaner interoperation with legacy APIs</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing to do.</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2503">2503</a></td><td>multiline option should be added to syntax_option_type</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2510">2510</a></td><td>Tag types should not be DefaultConstructible</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2514">2514</a></td><td>Type traits must not be final</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing to do</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2519">2519</a></td><td>Iterator operator-= has gratuitous undefined behaviour</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing to do</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2531">2531</a></td><td>future::get should explicitly state that the shared state is released</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2534">2534</a></td><td>Constrain rvalue stream operators</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2536">2536</a></td><td>What should &lt;complex.h&gt; do?</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>We already do this</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2540">2540</a></td><td>unordered_multimap::insert hint iterator</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>We already do this</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2543">2543</a></td><td>LWG 2148 (hash support for enum types) seems under-specified</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>We already do this</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2544">2544</a></td><td>istreambuf_iterator(basic_streambuf<charT, traits>* s) effects unclear when s is 0</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>We already do this</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2556">2556</a></td><td>Wide contract for future::share()</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Patch ready</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2562">2562</a></td><td>Consistent total ordering of pointers by comparison functors</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2567">2567</a></td><td>Specification of logical operator traits uses BaseCharacteristic, which is defined only for UnaryTypeTraits and BinaryTypeTraits</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing to do.</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2569">2569</a></td><td>conjunction and disjunction requirements are too strict</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing to do.</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2570">2570</a></td><td>[fund.ts.v2] conjunction and disjunction requirements are too strict</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2578">2578</a></td><td>Iterator requirements should reference iterator traits</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing to do</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2584">2584</a></td><td><regex> ECMAScript IdentityEscape is ambiguous</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2589">2589</a></td><td>match_results can't satisfy the requirements of a container</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing to do</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2591">2591</a></td><td>std::function's member template target() should not lead to undefined behaviour</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2598">2598</a></td><td>addressof works on temporaries</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Patch ready</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2664">2664</a></td><td>operator/ (and other append) semantics not useful if argument has root</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing to do</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2665">2665</a></td><td>remove_filename() post condition is incorrect</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>See Below</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2672">2672</a></td><td>Should is_empty use error_code in its specification?</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>We already do this</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2678">2678</a></td><td>std::filesystem enum classes overspecified</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing to do</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2679">2679</a></td><td>Inconsistent Use of Effects and Equivalent To</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing to do</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2680">2680</a></td><td>Add "Equivalent to" to filesystem</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing to do</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2681">2681</a></td><td>filesystem::copy() cannot copy symlinks</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>We already do this</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2682">2682</a></td><td>filesystem::copy() won't create a symlink to a directory</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Implemented in trunk</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2686">2686</a></td><td>Why is std::hash specialized for error_code, but not error_condition?</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Patch ready</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2694">2694</a></td><td>Application of LWG 436 accidentally deleted definition of "facet"</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing to do</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2696">2696</a></td><td>Interaction between make_shared and enable_shared_from_this is underspecified</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2699">2699</a></td><td>Missing restriction in [numeric.requirements]</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2712">2712</a></td><td>copy_file(from, to, ...) has a number of unspecified error conditions</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Implemented in trunk</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2722">2722</a></td><td>equivalent incorrectly specifies throws clause</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>We already do this</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2729">2729</a></td><td>Missing SFINAE on std::pair::operator=</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2732">2732</a></td><td>Questionable specification of path::operator/= and path::append</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing to do</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2733">2733</a></td><td>[fund.ts.v2] gcd / lcm and bool</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2735">2735</a></td><td>std::abs(short), std::abs(signed char) and others should return int instead of double in order to be compatible with C++98 and C</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2736">2736</a></td><td>nullopt_t insufficiently constrained</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2738">2738</a></td><td>is_constructible with void types</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>We already do this</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2739">2739</a></td><td>Issue with time_point non-member subtraction with an unsigned duration</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Patch Ready</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2740">2740</a></td><td>constexpr optional<T>::operator-></td><td>Issaquah</td><td>We already do this</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2742">2742</a></td><td>Inconsistent string interface taking string_view</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Patch Ready</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2744">2744</a></td><td>any's in_place constructors</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Implemented in trunk</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2745">2745</a></td><td>[fund.ts.v2] Implementability of LWG 2451</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2747">2747</a></td><td>Possibly redundant std::move in [alg.foreach]</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Patch ready</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2748">2748</a></td><td>swappable traits for optionals</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>We already do this</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2749">2749</a></td><td>swappable traits for variants</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2750">2750</a></td><td>[fund.ts.v2] LWG 2451 conversion constructor constraint</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2752">2752</a></td><td>"Throws:" clauses of async and packaged_task are unimplementable</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2753">2753</a></td><td>Optional's constructors and assignments need constraints</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>We already do this</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2754">2754</a></td><td>The in_place constructors and emplace functions added by P0032R3 don't require CopyConstructible</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>We already do this</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2755">2755</a></td><td>§[string.view.io] uses non-existent basic_string_view::to_string function</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>We already do this</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2756">2756</a></td><td>C++ WP optional<T> should 'forward' T's implicit conversions</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Implemented in trunk</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2758">2758</a></td><td>std::string{}.assign("ABCDE", 0, 1) is ambiguous</td><td>We already do this</td><td></td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2759">2759</a></td><td>gcd / lcm and bool for the WP</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Patch ready</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2760">2760</a></td><td>non-const basic_string::data should not invalidate iterators</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing to do</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2765">2765</a></td><td>Did LWG 1123 go too far?</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2767">2767</a></td><td>not_fn call_wrapper can form invalid types</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>We already do this</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2768">2768</a></td><td>any_cast and move semantics</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Resolved by LWG 2769</td></tr>
     <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2769">2769</a></td><td>Redundant const in the return type of any_cast(const any&)</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Implemented in trunk</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2771">2771</a></td><td>Broken Effects of some basic_string::compare functions in terms of basic_string_view</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>We already do this</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2773">2773</a></td><td>Making std::ignore constexpr</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2777">2777</a></td><td>basic_string_view::copy should use char_traits::copy</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Patch Ready</td></tr>
	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2778">2778</a></td><td>basic_string_view is missing constexpr</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
  </table>

<h3>Comments about the issues</h3>
<ul>
<li>2062 - We already do this; added some tests to make sure we keep doing so.</li>
<li>2166 - I <b>suspect</b> that this is just better specification of the existing structure. Probably need more tests for this.</li>
<li>2221 - Patch and tests ready</li>
<li>2223 - This is just wording cleanup. </li>
<li>2261 - <b>Survey our containers to make sure we do this.</b> Ideally, this will result in no code changes.</li>
<li>2394 - This is just wording cleanup.</li>
<li>2460 - This is just wording cleanup.</li>
<li>2468 - <i>I think we already do this; but will need to survey the libray to be sure</i></li>
<li>2475 - Nothing to do here. </li>
<li>2503 - </li>
<li>2510 - <b>Need to write tests for all the tag types</b></li>
<li>2514 - Nothing to do; We don't mark any of the type traits as final. </li>
<li>2519 - This is just wording cleanup. </li>
<li>2531 - This <b>should be</b> just wording cleanup. </li>
<li>2534 - </li>
<li>2536 - We already do this. </li>
<li>2540 - We already do this, and have tests for it.</li>
<li>2543 - </li>
<li>2544 - We already do this; I've added tests to make sure we keep doing so</li>
<li>2556 - Patch and tests ready</li>
<li>2562 - I <b>suspect</b> that this is just better specification of the existing structure. Probably need more tests for this.</li>
<li>2567 - This is just wording cleanup.</li>
<li>2569 - This is just wording cleanup.</li>
<li>2570 - Same as 2569, but applied to LFTS</li>
<li>2578 - This is just wording cleanup. </li>
<li>2584 - </li>
<li>2589 - This is just wording cleanup. </li>
<li>2591 - I <b>suspect</b> that this is just better specification of the existing structure. Probably need more tests for this.</li>
<li>2598 - Patch and tests ready</li>
<li>2664 - No change needed. _LIBCPP_DEBUG mode tests the new requirements.</li>
<li>2665 - PR is incorrect as-is. We implement a modified version</li>
<li>2672 - Patch and tests in tree. </li>
<li>2678 - No change needed. Mostly wording cleanup. </li>
<li>2679 - This is just wording cleanup. </li>
<li>2680 - This is just wording cleanup. </li>
<li>2681 - LGTM </li>
<li>2682 - Current PR is incorrect. A modified version has been implemented</li>
<li>2686 - Patch and tests ready</li>
<li>2694 - Restoring inadvertently deleted text. No code changes needed.</li>
<li>2696 - I <b>suspect</b> that this is just better specification of the existing structure. Probably need more tests for this.</li>
<li>2699 - I don't think this requires any code changes; look more closely.</li>
<li>2712 - LGTM. </li>
<li>2722 - LGTM </li>
<li>2729 - </li>
<li>2732 - Our implementation is already equivalent. </li>
<li>2733 - LFTS; same as 2759</li>
<li>2735 - I <b>suspect</b> that this is just better specification of the existing structure. Probably need more tests for this.</li>
<li>2736 - </li>
<li>2738 - We already do this; I added tests for cv-void</li>
<li>2739 - Patch and tests ready</li>
<li>2740 - <i>std::optional</i>: The resolution LGTM. </li>
<li>2742 - Patch and tests ready</li>
<li>2744 - <i>std::any</i>: We already do this. We also check for a decayed in_place_type_t. </li>
<li>2745 - <i>std::optional</i> for LFTS -- should be considered for C++17</li>
<li>2747 - Patch ready, but I can't think of any way to test it.</li>
<li>2748 - <i>std::optional</i>: LGTM. </li>
<li>2749 - <i>std::variant</i></li>
<li>2750 - <i>std::optional</i> for LFTS -- should be considered for C++17</li>
<li>2752 - </li>
<li>2753 - <i>std::optional</i>: LGTM. </li>
<li>2754 - <i>std::any</i>: LGTM. </li>
<li>2755 - Both string and string_view call a common routine for output; so no code changes needed.</li>
<li>2756 - <i>std::optional</i>: Very large change. It is fully implemented and tested. </li>
<li>2758 - We already do this. </li>
<li>2759 - Patch and tests ready</li>
<li>2760 - This is just wording cleanup; no code or test changes needed.</li>
<li>2765 - is this just wording cleanup????? I don't think this actually requires code changes. </li>
<li>2767 - The test case on the issue is incorrect. See not_fn.pass.cpp for the correct test case. </li>
<li>2768 - <i>std::any</i>: There is no PR for this issue. It is resolved by LWG 2769. </li>
<li>2769 - <i>std::any</i>: The PR looks good except that
	<code>remove_reference_t&lt;remove_cv_t&lt;T&gt;&gt;</code> should read
	<code>remove_cv_t&lt;remove_reference_t&lt;T&gt;&gt;</code>. </li>
<li>2771 - We already do this.</li>
<li>2773 - </li>
<li>2777 - Patch ready; existing tests should suffice</li>
<li>2778 - This is mostly tests.</li>
</ul>

<p>Last Updated: 10-Oct-2016</p>
</div>
</body>
</html>