aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/contrib/llvm/tools/lld/docs/index.rst
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'contrib/llvm/tools/lld/docs/index.rst')
-rw-r--r--contrib/llvm/tools/lld/docs/index.rst178
1 files changed, 178 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/contrib/llvm/tools/lld/docs/index.rst b/contrib/llvm/tools/lld/docs/index.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..2821ce4d214e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/contrib/llvm/tools/lld/docs/index.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
+LLD - The LLVM Linker
+=====================
+
+LLD is a linker from the LLVM project. That is a drop-in replacement
+for system linkers and runs much faster than them. It also provides
+features that are useful for toolchain developers.
+
+The linker supports ELF (Unix), PE/COFF (Windows), Mach-O (macOS) and
+WebAssembly in descending order of completeness. Internally, LLD consists of
+several different linkers. The ELF port is the one that will be described in
+this document. The PE/COFF port is complete, including
+Windows debug info (PDB) support. The WebAssembly port is still a work in
+progress (See :doc:`WebAssembly`). The Mach-O port is built based on a
+different architecture than the others. For the details about Mach-O, please
+read :doc:`AtomLLD`.
+
+Features
+--------
+
+- LLD is a drop-in replacement for the GNU linkers. That accepts the
+ same command line arguments and linker scripts as GNU.
+
+ We are currently working closely with the FreeBSD project to make
+ LLD default system linker in future versions of the operating
+ system, so we are serious about addressing compatibility issues. As
+ of February 2017, LLD is able to link the entire FreeBSD/amd64 base
+ system including the kernel. With a few work-in-progress patches it
+ can link approximately 95% of the ports collection on AMD64. For the
+ details, see `FreeBSD quarterly status report
+ <https://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2016-10-2016-12.html#Using-LLVM%27s-LLD-Linker-as-FreeBSD%27s-System-Linker>`_.
+
+- LLD is very fast. When you link a large program on a multicore
+ machine, you can expect that LLD runs more than twice as fast as GNU
+ gold linker. Your milage may vary, though.
+
+- It supports various CPUs/ABIs including x86-64, x86, x32, AArch64,
+ ARM, MIPS 32/64 big/little-endian, PowerPC, PowerPC 64 and AMDGPU.
+ Among these, x86-64 is the most well-supported target and have
+ reached production quality. AArch64 and MIPS seem decent too. x86
+ should be OK but not well tested yet. ARM support is being developed
+ actively.
+
+- It is always a cross-linker, meaning that it always supports all the
+ above targets however it was built. In fact, we don't provide a
+ build-time option to enable/disable each target. This should make it
+ easy to use our linker as part of a cross-compile toolchain.
+
+- You can embed LLD to your program to eliminate dependency to
+ external linkers. All you have to do is to construct object files
+ and command line arguments just like you would do to invoke an
+ external linker and then call the linker's main function,
+ ``lld::elf::link``, from your code.
+
+- It is small. We are using LLVM libObject library to read from object
+ files, so it is not completely a fair comparison, but as of February
+ 2017, LLD/ELF consists only of 21k lines of C++ code while GNU gold
+ consists of 198k lines of C++ code.
+
+- Link-time optimization (LTO) is supported by default. Essentially,
+ all you have to do to do LTO is to pass the ``-flto`` option to clang.
+ Then clang creates object files not in the native object file format
+ but in LLVM bitcode format. LLD reads bitcode object files, compile
+ them using LLVM and emit an output file. Because in this way LLD can
+ see the entire program, it can do the whole program optimization.
+
+- Some very old features for ancient Unix systems (pre-90s or even
+ before that) have been removed. Some default settings have been
+ tuned for the 21st century. For example, the stack is marked as
+ non-executable by default to tighten security.
+
+Performance
+-----------
+
+This is a link time comparison on a 2-socket 20-core 40-thread Xeon
+E5-2680 2.80 GHz machine with an SSD drive. We ran gold and lld with
+or without multi-threading support. To disable multi-threading, we
+added ``-no-threads`` to the command lines.
+
+============ =========== ============ ==================== ================== =============== =============
+Program Output size GNU ld GNU gold w/o threads GNU gold w/threads lld w/o threads lld w/threads
+ffmpeg dbg 92 MiB 1.72s 1.16s 1.01s 0.60s 0.35s
+mysqld dbg 154 MiB 8.50s 2.96s 2.68s 1.06s 0.68s
+clang dbg 1.67 GiB 104.03s 34.18s 23.49s 14.82s 5.28s
+chromium dbg 1.14 GiB 209.05s [1]_ 64.70s 60.82s 27.60s 16.70s
+============ =========== ============ ==================== ================== =============== =============
+
+As you can see, lld is significantly faster than GNU linkers.
+Note that this is just a benchmark result of our environment.
+Depending on number of available cores, available amount of memory or
+disk latency/throughput, your results may vary.
+
+.. [1] Since GNU ld doesn't support the ``-icf=all`` and
+ ``-gdb-index`` options, we removed them from the command line
+ for GNU ld. GNU ld would have been slower than this if it had
+ these options.
+
+Build
+-----
+
+If you have already checked out LLVM using SVN, you can check out LLD
+under ``tools`` directory just like you probably did for clang. For the
+details, see `Getting Started with the LLVM System
+<http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html>`_.
+
+If you haven't checkout out LLVM, the easiest way to build LLD is to
+checkout the entire LLVM projects/sub-projects from a git mirror and
+build that tree. You need `cmake` and of course a C++ compiler.
+
+.. code-block:: console
+
+ $ git clone https://github.com/llvm-project/llvm-project-20170507 llvm-project
+ $ mkdir build
+ $ cd build
+ $ cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=lld -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr/local ../llvm-project/llvm
+ $ make install
+
+Using LLD
+---------
+
+LLD is installed as ``ld.lld``. On Unix, linkers are invoked by
+compiler drivers, so you are not expected to use that command
+directly. There are a few ways to tell compiler drivers to use ld.lld
+instead of the default linker.
+
+The easiest way to do that is to overwrite the default linker. After
+installing LLD to somewhere on your disk, you can create a symbolic
+link by doing ``ln -s /path/to/ld.lld /usr/bin/ld`` so that
+``/usr/bin/ld`` is resolved to LLD.
+
+If you don't want to change the system setting, you can use clang's
+``-fuse-ld`` option. In this way, you want to set ``-fuse-ld=lld`` to
+LDFLAGS when building your programs.
+
+LLD leaves its name and version number to a ``.comment`` section in an
+output. If you are in doubt whether you are successfully using LLD or
+not, run ``readelf --string-dump .comment <output-file>`` and examine the
+output. If the string "Linker: LLD" is included in the output, you are
+using LLD.
+
+History
+-------
+
+Here is a brief project history of the ELF and COFF ports.
+
+- May 2015: We decided to rewrite the COFF linker and did that.
+ Noticed that the new linker is much faster than the MSVC linker.
+
+- July 2015: The new ELF port was developed based on the COFF linker
+ architecture.
+
+- September 2015: The first patches to support MIPS and AArch64 landed.
+
+- October 2015: Succeeded to self-host the ELF port. We have noticed
+ that the linker was faster than the GNU linkers, but we weren't sure
+ at the time if we would be able to keep the gap as we would add more
+ features to the linker.
+
+- July 2016: Started working on improving the linker script support.
+
+- December 2016: Succeeded to build the entire FreeBSD base system
+ including the kernel. We had widen the performance gap against the
+ GNU linkers.
+
+Internals
+---------
+
+For the internals of the linker, please read :doc:`NewLLD`. It is a bit
+outdated but the fundamental concepts remain valid. We'll update the
+document soon.
+
+.. toctree::
+ :maxdepth: 1
+
+ NewLLD
+ AtomLLD
+ WebAssembly
+ windows_support
+ ReleaseNotes