diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'TODO-2.1/core-team')
| -rw-r--r-- | TODO-2.1/core-team | 93 |
1 files changed, 93 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/TODO-2.1/core-team b/TODO-2.1/core-team new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..36d71d47e899 --- /dev/null +++ b/TODO-2.1/core-team @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ +# TODO File for the core-team as such. +# Revision: $Id: core-team,v 1.6 1995/05/30 06:45:57 rgrimes Exp $ +# +# This is things and issues the coreteam need to resolve. +# +-*----------------------------------------------------------------------------*- + +Update: Thu Apr 20 01:09:59 PDT 1995 +Due: Apr 22 1995 +Prio: High +Task: Should the files in the src-dist be "cvs co"'ed or "cvs export"'ed. + +Pro cvs co: + + cvs Id's and other magic stuff survives, so it people send us a + patch we don't risk loosing the cvs $Id: core-team,v 1.6 1995/05/30 06:45:57 rgrimes Exp $ info. + +Pro cvs export: + + If people import our source to a foreign cvs/rcs tree, we will not + loose our $Id: core-team,v 1.6 1995/05/30 06:45:57 rgrimes Exp $ info. + +Contra cvs export: + + The diff (& ctm-delta) to current is big for no good reason. + +-*- + +Update: Thu Apr 20 01:09:59 PDT 1995 +Due: Apr 22 1995 +Prio: High +Task: RELEASE/RELDATE strings + +Should we set the RELEASE to "CURRENT-yyyymmdd" as default in current +and fix it up in src/release/Makefile ? + +Should we set RELDATE to this month, or administratively at release time. + +Pro "this month": We would get better granularity for -current). + +Pro "admin": Thats the way Garrett meant it to be. + +-*- + +Update: Wed Apr 26 03:36:18 PDT 1995 +Due: Apr 22 1995 +Prio: High +Task: The name of 2.0.foo +State: Closed + +2.0.5 ... 2.0.9 or 2.1 ? + +Contra 2.0.5: pcvt jumped ahead of us :-/ + +[It has been declared by executive decision of the new release engineer (me) + to be 2.0.5, period. I needed to tell the artists something while everyone + was still wranging. It's too late. You will call it 2.0.5 and you will + like it. :-) -jkh] +-*- + +Update: Mon Apr 24 17:48:20 PDT 1995 +Due: Apr 27 1995 +Prio: Low +Task: Change to config + +While I can see the general idea that config will generate a + -D<KERNELNAME> +I have now received several emails from people with kernels named "DEBUG" +and thats not fun. + +Would the world end if config was changed to generate + -DKERNEL_<KERNELNAME> +instead ? + +-*- + +Update: Mon Apr 24 22:20:29 PDT 1995 +Due: Apr 30th 1995 +Prio: High +Task: Decide on mailinglist <-> newsgroup connection + +1) Should we gate -hackers into a newsgroup + 1-1-A) should we gate the newsgroup back ? + or + 1-1-B) use some header to direct replies back + + 1-2) What newsgroup + +2) as above, but -questions + +3) as above, but -current + +-*- |